Posted By José R. Cárdenas Share

The Associated Press dispatch from Honduras this past weekend opens thus:

The return of ousted former President Manuel Zelaya from exile Saturday brings Honduras' nearly two-year political crisis to an end and hope to one of the poorest nations in the Americas."

Sure. And if you believed that, you'd believe Fidel Castro is going to call for free and fair elections in Cuba next week.

Only the willfully deluded or the dangerously naïve would believe that the return of the disgraced former president means anything more than increased civic disturbances, more violence, and more chaos in one of Latin America's poorest countries.

Why? Because that is the way Hugo Chavez wants it.  

The Venezuelan autocrat has bankrolled the two-year exile of his puppet Zelaya, as well the international campaign to force the oligarch-turned-populist's return to Honduras.  Chavez has never gotten over the fact that Zelaya's attempt to replicate the Chavez model in Honduras was cut short by his impeachment by the Honduran Congress and his removal from office by order of the country's Supreme Court for violating the country's Constitution and other illegal acts. (Zelaya's apologists insist on characterizing what transpired as a "military coup.")

Chavez aims to exact his measure of revenge against Hondurans for their rejection of his radical populist project and, by hook or crook, either reinstall Zelaya as president or prepare the way for a successor who will finish the job.

While Chavez acting as the thug that he is comes as no surprise, what is noteworthy is the complicity of Colombian President Juan Manuel Santos, whose government teamed with Chavez to engineer Zelaya's return. It is now apparent that President Santos cannot run away fast enough from the legacy of his wildly successful and pro-U.S. predecessor Alvaro Uribe. And peace and stability in the region will be the poorer for it.

Santos's foreign minister, María Ángela Holguín, is in Washington this week for a bit of diplomatic back-slapping with Organization of American States (OAS) Secretary General José Miguel Insulza, another co-conspirator in forcing Zelaya's return who can always be counted on to do the wrong thing. (The OAS is scheduled to vote this week to reinstate Honduras, after they were suspended in the wake of Zelaya's ouster.)

So what we have here is that instead of allowing the Honduran people to move on with their lives following the turbulent and polarizing Zelaya years, they are now forced to accept the anti-democratic fox back into the henhouse just so a few Latin American politicians can preen before the cameras celebrating their diplomatic "victory."

And just what message is this "victory" sending to the hemisphere? That it is perfectly acceptable that an elected president can run roughshod over democratic institutions, undermine separation of powers, and rewrite the constitution to seek indefinite re-election? That co-equal branches of government must remain supine before any president bent on aggressively aggrandizing power? That the Chavez model is a paragon of democratic legitimacy and rule of law and any attempts to legally thwart it are ipso facto illegitimate?

How noble. And what will these leaders say when the first Honduran lies dead in the street because of Zelaya's irresponsible and reckless exhortations? How easy it is to let someone else be a martyr for your cause.

Zelaya's return to Honduras is no victory for democracy, rule of law, or the inter-American system. It's a flat-out defeat for the principles upon which any healthy democracy is based. And, sadly, the price will be paid by the Honduran people.

(Full disclosure: In July 2009, I was part of a team that advised a Honduran delegation that traveled to Washington to defend the constitutionality of Zelaya's removal from power.)

Andres Conteris/AFP/Getty Images

EXPLORE:LATIN AMERICA
 

LATAM123

9:39 PM ET

June 1, 2011

Although Zelaya's actions may

Although Zelaya's actions may have been unconstitutional, it doesn't make his removal legal. I agree that his return will most definetely not bring any benefit to Honduras, but I think Santos and Chavez' actions are actually working towards a more democratic Latin America; we can't go back to the times where presidents are simply ousted because of who supports them or the initiatives they're trying to implement. The ideal scenario would be one where institutions in Honduras or whichever country can actually remove someone from power through legal means when they're actions are unconstitutional, not removal by force. Of course, i realize this would not happen, but it definetely doesn't make his removal legal. (note: i am anything but a Zelaya supporter)

 

BRADMEISTER007

3:49 AM ET

June 5, 2011

Response to LATAM123

No one is above the law. When Manuel Zelaya brazenly defied a key ruling handed down by the Honduras Supreme Court, it was entirely appropriate for him to be deposed. Imagine if Richard Nixon had defied the Supreme Court of the United States when it ruled that he must relinquish the Watergate tapes in August of 1974. If Nixon had thumbed his nose at the Supreme Court and refused to give up the tapes or refused to leave the White House following what would have been an inevitable impeachment, our military would have been left with no other choice but to remove him from office. Of course, the unthinkable never occurred. Richard Nixon respected the unanimous decision of the US Supreme Court and turned over the tapes. Zelaya, by contrast, did not respect the decision of his nation's highest court. Zelaya thereby forfeited his right to remain in office.

 

SAM FROM CALIFORNIA

12:55 AM ET

June 2, 2011

Same old same old from the American right

Dress it up as much as you like it, the removal of Zelaya was far less democratic than anything Hugo Chavez or crew has done so far in their countries. It was the Cold War all over again ... rightwing elites using state power to repress people elected by poorer sectors of society ostensibly to protect "democratic institutions", oblivious to the fact that their own actions did far more to degrade the legitimacy of said institutions.

 

TRUTHERATOR

5:56 PM ET

June 5, 2011

Same ol' same ol' from the Left

The golpista Zelaya of 2009 was NOT the candidate Zelaya that Hondurans had voted for in 2005.

Hondurans know in massive numbers that the best thing for "democracy" in Honduras was the removal of Zelaya from office. They all knew that even the poor despised him, because Honduras did NOT want to become another Venezuela or Cuba. Hondurans despise Communism and they were not fooled by the lying rants against Zelaya's own "elite" class.

More importantly, they knew that if he was pushing this "referendum" it was because Zelaya's agents had the thing already rigged, and the fraud ready to go, which it turns out they did. By the way, Hugo Llorens and the US administration was also openly AND SECRETLY supporting this coup by a leftist in Honduras which they did not want!

That's why Hondurans went to the polls in the highest turnout ever for an election in Honduras, and voted overwhelmingly against the political party that had offered up Zelaya before.

 

ARTURBARRERA

3:59 PM ET

June 2, 2011

Pocos escritos como este

Usted es un hombre que esta claro. Lo que falta es juzgar a los que sacaron sin piyamas y sin el cepillo de dientes a Zelaya. Juzgarlos por haber olvidado estos utensilios. Así es la política entre males menores. Por supuesto ni Santos ni mucho hondureños tienen idea de lo que perdieron aún ganando una paz cartaginesa.

Escribí hace años este artículo que quizás lo disfrute usted. Los venezolanos al igual que los hondureños hemos ido de mentiras en mentiras. Y vaya mentiras que nos metieron con la democracia copiándola de la Republica de los EE. UU aquella es por máxima ''el imperio de la ley'' esta es por minimo el ''imperio de los políticos''. Aunque sabremos cuando se desclasifiquen los documentos el papel que jugaron en la antesala Brasil y USA, robándose el cuento y la gloria: Colombia y venezuela.

http://goo.gl/bSZqV

 

POOLSHARK

6:21 PM ET

June 2, 2011

Sad day for Honduras

I am glad someone besides myself is not deluded or naive. This will only bring more deaths and problems. Honduras doesn't need this. They are about to enter into their golden age. All Zelaya is doing is holding them back.
Great article

 

AUGUST WEST

10:33 PM ET

June 2, 2011

Did Senor Cárdenas also defend Honduran death squads?

Honduras had a little problem with death squads in the 1980s. Remember Battalion 3-16? They killed a few hundred Hondurans in the name of fighting Communism. Where was Sr. Cárdenas then?

 

Shadow Government is a blog about U.S. foreign policy under the Obama administration, written by experienced policy makers from the loyal opposition and curated by Peter D. Feaver and William Inboden.

Read More