Monday, May 2, 2011 - 11:40 AM
The killing of Osama bin Laden marks a great day for America, for the world, and for the hope of justice. As many others have commented, the successful operation ordered by President Obama and carried out by the CIA and Special Forces operators culminated years of effort across multiple domains of intelligence, law enforcement, diplomacy, and the military. Many streams converged to make this happen -- from the counter-terrorism policies and institutions established after the 9/11 attacks, to the first intelligence collected from Guantanamo detainees four years ago about the identity of bin Laden's courier, to the identification of bin Laden's compound last August, to the NSC's careful deliberations and President Obama's decision to eschew bombing the compound in favor of an assault that would bring the tremendous benefit of securing bin Laden's body, to the operation itself. This is a moment in which the White House can take pride, as can all of those dedicated American officials who devoted substantial portions of their lives to the hunt for bin Laden over the past decade. All of them deserve our fervent gratitude. A few additional thoughts:
It will be interesting to see whether intelligence gathered at bin Laden's safe house is of assistance in running down Zawahiri and other al Qaeda operatives, or in providing insight into the organizations relationships within Pakistan. To the extent Pakistanis regard an operation to kill the world's leading terrorist primarily as an affront to Pakistan's sovereignty, the exploitation of intelligence gained in this operation may be complicated.
"And the statements from Muslim Brotherhood leaders to the effect of "we're glad he's gone but the United States should leave Muslim lands" are disturbing in their moral equivalency."
How does one measure "moral equivalency"? Pick a metric. Any casually-brutal metric will suffice. By the number of deaths of innocents? By the destruction of indigenous institutions of governance? By the thwarting of a peoples' efforts at self-determination? What's the metric? By any non-propagandistic measure the U.S. has been morally liable to a far greater degree since say the first imperialistic venture in the Philippines in 1898 than say Bin Ladin and his gang of cowardly criminals who have only had a couple of decades. The Muslim Brotherhood, which may represent about 20% of the Egyptian [roughly equivalent to the Teapublican Party] and whose members have been the recipient of torture by the U.S.-supported former-regime, may have a better understanding of moral equivalencies than someone living in D.C.
Yes - that's right - the Muslim Brotherhood is on equal moral footing with the United States; perhaps even superior moral footing. Shall we ask Hezbollah and Hamas to join us on this moral high ground or should they occupy the higher ground? Do you mean to imply that if the United States had never engaged in any foreign venture that the world would be a better place?
The United States is far from perfect, I'd be the first to admit that. But try living under the Muslim Brotherhood - or whatever regime they'd offer. My guess is you'd be wishing for the United States and its protections fairly quickly.
Unless your a muslim male - then I suppose you might be ok with it all.
Shadow Government is a blog about U.S. foreign policy under the Obama administration, written by experienced policy makers from the loyal opposition and curated by Peter D. Feaver and William Inboden.
Read More
(3)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE