Posted By William Tobey Share

North Korea's revelations of a long-suspected illicit uranium enrichment program, construction of a new, larger nuclear reactor, and its unprovoked artillery attack on South Korean territory raise the stakes in an already dangerous situation. It is time to think strategically, not tactically, and for resolve, not appeasement.

North Korea's benighted regime is corrupt, brutal, incompetent, and violently aggressive. The scale of its crimes against the Korean people is evident even from outer space at night as a black armband of poverty across the Peninsula, surrounded by the bright lights of prosperity burning from China and South Korea. Very likely over a million people in the North starved to death during the 1990s due to Pyongyang's twin policies of juche (self-reliance), and meeting military needs first. Political prisoners are held in camps scattered throughout the North, but in a very real sense, nearly all of its citizens are prisoners of the state.

The North Korean regime could not exist without support from China. Beijing provides trade, aid, and political sustenance sufficient to keep the failed state from complete collapse. It does so to avoid a flood of refugees or political instability which might spread to China. Moreover, this tragic situation is made dangerous by North Korea's behavior overseas.

In the 1980s, North Korean agents committed acts of terrorism, including bombing an airliner and attempting to assassinate the South Korean president during a state visit to Burma.  North Korea kidnapped dozens of Japanese and South Korean citizens to exploit them for intelligence purposes. Pyongyang is the leading exporter of ballistic missiles to dangerous regimes, most likely was the source of some of the material shipped to Libya's nuclear program, and helped Syria to build a covert plutonium production reactor, which could have been used to produce nuclear weapons, had it not been destroyed by Israeli jets in September 2007. Twice recently, North Korea has attacked the South with military force.  These actions are inconsistent with international peace and security.

The newly unveiled uranium enrichment program is a particularly dangerous development. It gives the North another path to make fissile material for nuclear weapons-and might provide a further revenue source from illicit sales. It is very unlikely that this program grew to its present size-reportedly 2,000 centrifuges in a "stunning" modern facility-in the months between the departure of U.S. and international inspectors in the spring of 2009 and now. A more plausible explanation is that the newly-revealed facility is the fruit of a long-suspected program, undertaken in violation of numerous international agreements.

An early temptation will be to view the situation tactically-to ask what can be done to calm the crisis? This is a sensible impulse; preventing war is a worthy goal. Strategic considerations, however, are also important. Consistent with its paramount interests in avoiding political instability and refugee flows, China will be eager to calm the situation. The United States and its allies must take the case to Beijing that long term stability on the Peninsula can only be guaranteed by truly ending the Korean War. Eventually -- like all dynasties -- Kim's will end. The choice for Beijing is thus whether it will continue heroic measures to maintain a terminal patient, thereby extending the North Korean people's misery and threats to international security, or alternatively plan for and work toward a peaceful, stable, democratic, and reunited Korean Peninsula. Beijing's apparent acquiescence to dynastic succession in North Korea was a mistake. In light of recent developments, China has the opportunity to correct that mistake, and Washington has stronger arguments to persuade Beijing to do so.

 

HANS B. PANDJAITAN

5:03 AM ET

November 24, 2010

North Korea Black mail or War

What is the attitude of North Korea's blackmail or war?
It is feared that would happen as with Sadam Hussein's Iraq suspected of storing nuclear and not proven. I guess Kim Il Sung dinasty will collapse due to the recent terror and his image big statue will be destroyed like Sadam Hussein. H-hour is just around the corner. Wait and see.

 

HURRICANEWARNING

4:47 PM ET

November 24, 2010

yeah, so? Whats your point?

yeah, so? Whats your point? you're assuming that would somehow be what...unjust or bad? explain yourself.

 

HANS B. PANDJAITAN

4:25 AM ET

November 25, 2010

North Korea Black mail or War

My point is crystal clear: H- hour is around the corner and no country could effort being target of blackmail. North Korea being proud of their nuclear arsenal may be good for them, but too proud sometimes is fool.

 

GRANT

7:05 PM ET

November 24, 2010

I suspect we are seriously

I suspect we are seriously overestimating China's abilities to put pressure on North Korea. Take the example of Israel and the United States for a moment. More than a few nations have wondered "will the U.S put pressure on Israel NOW?" without understanding that in practice it's actually difficult for the U.S to do that. Add to that the fact that if North Korea does collapse it could very well mean U.S soldiers on the border with China and it becomes more apparent why China is so nervous about pressure.
On another note we really shouldn't presume that North Korea is about to collapse. China was being ripped apart in the 1950s by state-caused (accidental) famines, widespread murder and repression and the destruction of intellectualism left in China. Based on where China was in the 1950s we could have made the assumption that it was about to collapse. As long as the North Koreans can keep the elites united and opposition nonexistent it's entirely possible that the state will continue for decades, especially if some economic reforms are put in place and some of the more conservative elements kept in check.

 

MARTY MARTEL

7:42 PM ET

November 24, 2010

It will have to wait for a Chinese Gorbachev

American foreign policy establishment can condemn all it wants the brutal regime of North Korea. North Korea can take it all and still hit back with counter punches as long as it has godfather China in its corner.

As such Kim’s regime is China’s puppet no matter how strongly China denies it.

North Korea’s nuclear program is China’s creation even though US wants to ignore that fact. Even Pakistan would not have dared to supply uranium enrichment technology to North Korea in return for Chinese ballistic missile technology if Pakistan’s all-weather friend China would have strongly objected to it.

North Korean refugees flooding China if Kim’s regime collapses is a poppy cock story that only naïve US will buy.

Kim’s dynasty will survive as long as China is there to support it and will end if and when a Gorbachev comes to power in China which is not going to happen in foreseeable future.

 

GRANT

9:37 PM ET

November 24, 2010

To start your mention of

To start your mention of Gorbachev is unfortunate as the Chinese took the lesson from his fate that they have to avoid political freedom if they want China to remain strong. Following that is the fact that we often defend Israel from condemnation from other states and few in the U.S think of Israel as a puppet (we often wish we had that kind of control over Israel's actions). Third on the list is that I don't know of any evidence that China has had any role in helping North Korea develop a nuclear program, or anything to suggest that China's relationship with Pakistan had anything to do with North Korea. Lastly your comment on the refugees is downright ludicrous. Their existence has been very well documented by the Wall Street Journal, the BBC, the New York Times, Amnesty International and so many more different news agencies and organizations and I don't see how the conclusion that many more will reach for the relative safety of China if the Kim government collapses is 'poppycock'. Indeed, based on history (and recent events across Africa, Asia and the Middle East) all suggest that increased refugees should be expected.

 

MISHMAEL

8:16 PM ET

November 24, 2010

Marty,

Dragging China into this will make the situation not just about North Korea. If you refuse to see things from another's perspective, then you will never elicit any cooperation from anybody.

For China, the issue of dealing with North Korea is inextricably linked with its relations with South Korea, Japan, and the USA. Right now, there exists an alliance between SK, Japan, and USA that is implicitly directed at China. Any move on their part to weaken North Korea, the only other state not within the USA-SK-Japan circle, will weaken their position as well. It is therefore impossible for them to proceed in that direction because it would directly reduce their power, influence, and security.

In case anyone wants to mention the terrible atrocities within North Korea, I can only say that the situation there is the choice of the North Korean leadership. It is untrue, and unfair, to blame any other nation for North Korea's policies. There is no evidence anywhere to suggest that Chinese officials play any role in the day to day governance or the decision making process of North Korea

Their belligerence on the other hand is a definite threat to South Korea, and perhaps Japan. However, For China the main threat is the American deployment in the region. We know that the US is willing to invade nations for their own ends, and so the Chinese are first and foremost interested in keeping that military distracted.

A permanent cessation of North Korea will not be a simple matter of getting China to tell it what to do. It requires an honest discussion on the part of the Americans, South Koreans, Japanese, as well as the Chinese on the future balance of power in Asia. There will be no cooperation unless all 4 nations are in agreement of what that future will look like. At present, the completely reasonable objection that China has to the American military presence aimed at themselves is what prevents cooperation between the two. Furthermore, trust is not possible so long as South Korea and Japan consider the interests of the USA before the interests of China.

 

Shadow Government is a blog about U.S. foreign policy under the Obama administration, written by experienced policy makers from the loyal opposition and curated by Peter D. Feaver and William Inboden.

Read More