Posted By Peter Feaver
Wednesday, March 31, 2010 - 2:08 PM
Share
Financial Times reporter Edward Luce has a fascinating follow-up to his earlier story
about foreign policy decision-making in the Obama White House.
The general theme is familiar: President Obama dominates his foreign policy
apparatus and serves as his own grand strategist. What I found
interesting was the way the not-for-attribution quotes praising the process
seemed to be contradicted by the other reporting in the story. To wit:
-
On
the one hand, a senior Obama official claims that the focus of the administration in the first year was fixing a broken system that allowed
Vice President Cheney to circumvent the bureaucracy; money quote, "By
getting the process right, we are improving the quality of decisions." On the other hand, my FP colleague David
Rothkopf is quoted in the story as noting that: "Fairly
or not, [NSC Chief of Staff Denis] McDonough has been perceived as
representing a process that was taking place in another room, among the
inner circle, at a table to which most weren't invited." McDonough is technically junior to National
Security Advisor Jim Jones, but is widely viewed as much closer to the
President and, as one official put it, "Instead of Jim
Jones telling McDonough what the president thinks, it is the other way
round."
- On
the one hand, a senior Obama official praises the process and Obama's due
diligence: "When the president finally makes a decision, it is
with the full facts and usually shows a high calibre of judgment." On the other hand, the article reports a very
different process for Obama's signature foreign policy priority of last
Spring, the confrontation with Israel over the settlements issue: "In
a heated showdown in the Oval Office last May, in which Mr Netanyahu
refused to accede to Mr Obama's demand, the only officials present were Mr
Emanuel and David Axelrod, senior adviser to Mr Obama in office and during
the campaign. Gen Jones was not there. The fallout put the talks in
abeyance and damped high Arab hopes for Mr Obama" I cannot recall a similar foreign policy issue that was
handled in this fashion in the Bush era and, as a general matter, Karl
Rove (Axelrod's Bush-era counterpart) played a far less prominent role on
national security.
I was especially drawn to one further point in the story, a point that has not
been contradicted in anything I have read or seen first-hand: the pace is
grueling and it takes a personal toll on the national security and White House
staff. This is not unique to the Obama administration and is something of
a hardy perennial in Washington. The 9/11 attacks were a turning point,
however, and the system has run at breakneck speed ever since. Even
though President Obama has been more focused on domestic policy over the last
year, the pace for the national security staff has not eased.
A recent trip to Washington with the dual purpose of attending a reception
honoring my former boss, Steve Hadley, and separately meeting with current
national security officials put this issue in sharp relief for me. My
friends from the Bush era, looking much better rested and healthier than I
remember them appearing before, swapped stories of our time in the fox-hole.
And my friends from the Obama era shared eerily similar stories with some
of the very same complaints: outsiders just don't get it or get distracted by
secondary trivialities. One current insider confided to me that when he
reads outsider critiques of the Obama team, he is reminded of similar critiques
he offered of the Bush team when he was in the shadow government. He
thought some of my own analysis missed the boat and conceded that perhaps the
same was true for some his earlier analysis of Bush decisionmaking.
That is a wise cautionary to remember. Those of us in the loyal
opposition may have a better understanding than most about the travails and
triumphs of the current team, but our perspective is limited. We should
not be surprised to read internally contradictory accounts of what is going on
behind the scenes. And we should be willing to give the benefit of the
doubt from time to time.
Read More
(1)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE