Kudos for the calling card in Kabul

Posted By Peter Feaver Monday, March 29, 2010 - 10:14 AM Share

In previous posts and musings, I have gently chided President Obama for allowing the perception that he is slighting the Commander-in-Chief role to take hold. I also worried that White House political advisors would come to believe avoiding national security was a shrewd political move. And I expressed some concern about the roll-out of Obama's Afghan strategy, which I think confused as much as it clarified.

With all that nattering and niggling, it would be churlish if I did not praise President Obama and his team for the quick trip to the war zone over the weekend. It is praiseworthy on a number of accounts:

First, they get credit for pulling off a surprise visit. For a White House that has seemed in disarray and riven with internal factions, a surprise trip shows that they still have good internal discipline at the staff level.
Second, the President's meeting with the troops was effective and apparently well-received. In war-time the commander-in-chief's role as communicator-in-chief, not only to the general public but especially to the military rank and file must not be ignored.
Third, the President apparently administered some tough love to Afghan President Karzai. Relations with the Afghan leader are a critical factor in the ultimate success of the mission. Those relations suffered enormously last year and it is good to see President Obama take seriously his role in putting the relationship on a more productive trajectory.

When I heard about the trip, I hoped that President Obama might also include Baghdad on his itinerary. The situation there is especially delicate and the Iraqi political leaders will probably need high-level help if they are to avoid lasting and damaging political paralysis. The Baghdad drop-by did not happen, but Obama's quick Kabul visit may be a welcome harbinger of a renewed focus on the wars he is leading.

JIM WATSON/AFP/Getty Images

EXPLORE:AFGHANISTAN

(2)

HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE

THEDUDEABIDES

11:25 PM ET

March 29, 2010

oops!

I thought by Shadow Government you meant the one run by Dick Cheney and Benjamin Netanyahu that keeps calling President Obama Naive because he wants peace and a two state solution

SAINTSIMON

11:22 AM ET

March 30, 2010

completely wrong. This was so

completely wrong. This was so obviously staged as dressing for political wounds - the thinking clearly was 'we're gonna ram this health care bill through congress and everyone's gonna see us as the left wing ideologues that we are - so let's throw some smoke, go visit the troops, give a nice speech, the right will have to say something nice about us'. As far as the speech itself goes - who cares? The only people who should be left following his speeches with any seriousness are the sycophantic acolytes that adore him - anyone else should be extremely wary at this point: when pontificating he's either weaving half truths with outright lies, spewing nice sounding but ultimately meaningless fluff, extolling his own virtues and wonderfulness, taking credit for something awful Pelosi has done, or throwing smoke. He knows you conservatives have to give him credit for something, can't be negative all the time, so he strings you along with some nice military gibberish - and you buy it!! C'mon. I mean, I think he's a horrible president, but he sure knows how to play a sucker when he sees one.

Shadow Government is a blog about U.S. foreign policy under the Obama administration, written by experienced policy makers from the loyal opposition and curated by Peter D. Feaver and William Inboden.