Posted By José R. Cárdenas Share

The murders of two employees of the U.S. consulate in the violent Mexican border city of Ciudad Juarez serve as a grim, and likely unwanted, reminder to the Obama administration of the drug-fueled carnage taking place just across our southern border. With the range of foreign policy challenges on the President's plate, the last thing he probably wants to contemplate at this point is a deepening involvement in a messy entanglement involving ruthless drug cartels and a besieged government and society on our doorstep.

But foreign crises operate by no calendar, and, given the stakes involved, the Obama administration has no choice but to give higher priority to supporting Mexican President Felípe Calderón's declared war against the cartels in what will be a long, drawn out (and, in many quarters, controversial) struggle for the future of our neighbor and third-largest trading partner.

The administration deserves credit for following through on President Bush's commitment to President Calderón in Merida in 2007 to provide U.S. support for his effort to seize back his country from the grip of the drug mafias. Under the subsequently named Merida Initiative, the U.S. is providing more than $1 billion over three years in counter-narcotics assistance to Mexico, to include weapon-detection technology, surveillance and intelligence-gathering equipment, helicopters and training for police, prison, and military personnel. Look at that as a down-payment.

The effort in Mexico will involve a transformation no less dramatic than what Colombia has undergone over the past decade (and where the U.S. has invested some $7 billion in counter-narcotics and counter-insurgency assistance). From fundamental overhauls of the military and police, the judiciary and financial systems, and social and economic programs to head off the descent into the drug culture by the citizenry, the challenge Mexico faces is steep and costly.

And the United States is no innocent bystander. It is our society's insatiable demand for illicit narcotics that fuels the drug violence in Mexico. The demand for cocaine, marijuana, heroin, and methamphetamines is a plague visited not only on our own youth and social fabric but on Mexico's as well. As such, we have a responsibility and duty to not only combat the demand on the home front through prevention and rehabilitation programs, but also assist our neighbors combating the criminal elements profiting off such trade.

Just as Plan Colombia before it, the Merida Initiative has generated controversy: from the NGO industrial complex, that fears an empowered Mexican military and police will run roughshod over human rights; to those who oppose a military strategy in favor of attacking the social and economic roots of the drug culture or targeting the cartels' financial structures; and those who argue for decriminalization of drug use to end the carnage. (Former Mexican foreign minister Jorge Castaneda, concluding the drug war is lost after only three years, recently made that case elsewhere on this site.)

Yet aside from the latter, there is no reason why all of that cannot be incorporated into a comprehensive strategy, much as we have done in our partnership with Colombia. Certainly the drug war in Mexico will not be won without fundamental reforms of the judiciary, rooting out corruption, addressing broader societal ills, and employing sophisticated financial strategies to choke off the cartels' profits. But neither will those initiatives have any chance of succeeding without robust military and police pressures on the cartels that include arresting kingpins, breaking up networks, and interdicting drug shipments: anything and everything that drives up the cost of doing their nefarious business.
The Obama administration can signal its continuing support and commitment to President Calderon's brave and unprecedented campaign to save his country from further damage by the drug mafias by formally committing to a follow-on phase to Merida, a Merida Initiative II, just as was done in Colombia. This would key of the progress made to date and expand, in partnership with the Mexican government, the "softer" side reforms so desperately needed to strengthen the judiciary and civil society -- while continuing the "hard" side of taking the war to the cartels.
With some 90 percent of the cocaine and much of the marijuana crossing our borders from Mexico, our security and societal well-being is directly affected by what is happening there. President Calderón has embarked on a campaign that none of his predecessors has dared, despite years of U.S. pleadings; that is, rescue his country from the violence and lawlessness of the drug trade and welcome U.S. partnership in doing so. The country has already paid a high price, with up to a reported 18,000 deaths in the past three years (albeit many of those caused by internecine gang warfare over turf).
The Obama administration has acknowledged a "shared responsibility" to combat the drug trade. Today, more than ever, that sentiment needs to be backed by strong action in support of a friend of the U.S. trying to do the right thing.

ALFREDO ESTRELLA/AFP/Getty Images

 
Facebook|Twitter|Reddit

LITTLEMANTATE

7:10 PM ET

March 19, 2010

End the b.s.- legalize it

Stop coddling evangelical pseudo-fascists, the prison-industrial complex, war profiteers and other venal and corrupt parasites. We need some people with actual morals in Congress beyond Paul, Kucenich and Grayson and a few others.

 

MARIE SENILLA

7:35 PM ET

March 20, 2010

The NGO-Industrial Complex

Yes, of course. But these support the same forces which the military-industrial-complex supports.

The failed approach for which Foreign Policy advocates here sounds much like that supported by the Drug Policy Alliance and WOLA.

For more on the serious threat and fatal shortcomings of Plan Mexico here:

http://friendsofbradwill.org/issues/the-merida-initiative/

and excellent needed intervention here:

http://friendsofbradwill.org/2008/12/video-three-men-and-a-baby-vs-senator-dodd-and-wola/

MS

 

GISELLA DE MORAIS

3:49 AM ET

April 7, 2010

I was pleasantly surprised

I was pleasantly surprised this week when I encountered your post on Mexico’s drug war and the issues surrounding the situation after the recent murders of the two United States Consulate employees. Not just was your post informative, but it also provided a necessary overview of what the US can and must do in order to assist Mexico in taking down the drug cartels. There were many aspects of your post with which I concurred, particularly when you emphasized the importance of Obama’s support in a Merida Initiative II. I do believe that a response solely based on “hard reform,” would be counterproductive and not address other underlying issues also taking precedence. You summarized the concept of reform strategies nicely when you stated that, “Certainly the drug war in Mexico will not be won without fundamental reforms of the judiciary, rooting out corruption, addressing broader societal ills, and employing sophisticated financial strategies to choke off the cartels' profits.” I believe you could also add lack of government transparency to your list, which the Human Rights Report of 2009 published by the US Department of State names as a one of the major hindrances to solving Mexico’s political corruption.

While you detailed the policy actions required by the Obama administration in order to support Calderón’s initiative, I was curious to know what other suggestions you may have for the Obama administration should a second Merida Initiative not be proposed or implemented. The admitted “shared responsibility,” made by Secretary of State Hilary Clinton is a tremendous first step for the United States government in its combined efforts with Mexico, however Clinton has made no suggestion as to future initiatives aside from simply handing out more money to Mexican law enforcement (for helicopters, technological services and such). The economic support is crucial since Mexico lacks certain resources though the US has failed to address any type of policy reforms to enact in its own country, for instance a stricter law regarding weapons sales. In order to promote this concept of shared responsibility, do you not think that since the majority of weapons fueling the conflict in Mexico are originally from the US that some type of legislation regarding arms sales should be enacted? Maybe a reinstitution of the assault rifle ban that expired in 2004? I’m a firm believer in the idea of monetary assistance, though handing Mexico billions of dollars and expecting a solution is unrealistic in my opinion. I think that stronger policies in the US must also go along with the financial support that the US is lending to Mexico, otherwise the United States is simply fueling the violence and drug consumption while taking no responsibility for its actions.

 

Shadow Government is a blog about U.S. foreign policy under the Obama administration, written by experienced policy makers from the loyal opposition and curated by Peter D. Feaver and William Inboden.

Read More