Posted By José R. Cárdenas Share

By José R. Cárdenas

Ordinarily, it’s easy to dismiss the rhetoric of Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez as just so much bombast meant to sate the appetites of his most radical followers. Witness, for example, his recently expressed admiration for Carlos the Jackal, Robert Mugabe, and, yes, Idi Amin.

Other times, however, Chávez wanders into territory of strategic interest to the United States, and his rhetoric, not to mention his actions, cannot be ignored.

Chávez’s latest saber-rattling vis-à-vis neighboring Colombia is just such an occasion.

What has set off the Venezuelan strongman this time is an October 30th Defense Cooperation Agreement between Colombia and the United States that allows U.S. counternarcotics air patrols to move from a base in Ecuador to bases in Colombia. (The U.S. presence at a base in Manta, Ecuador, was terminated by leftist President Rafael Correa.)

Since then, Chávez has been waving the bloody shirt, calling the agreement part of a plot to destabilize his regime and bellowing on Venezuelan TV, "Let's not waste a day on our main aim: to prepare for war…." He then ordered 15,000 troops to the Venezuelan-Colombian border.

Most sober analysts downplay the risk of an imminent outbreak of hostilities between the two countries, attributing Chávez’s latest hysterics to an attempt to divert domestic attention away from deteriorating economic conditions in Venezuela, including electricity and water shortages, and his own declining poll numbers. And they are probably right -- this time.

The problem going forward is this: The Venezuelan economy has just begun to free-fall, as outlays of petro-dollars are no longer able to paper over Venezuela’s systemic economic deficiencies under Chávez’s mismanagement. Private sector investment and output is declining, infrastructure is breaking down, and an overreliance on government spending is choking off growth. The result, to be played out over the next few months, is likely to be increasing discontent among a populace already fed up with shortages, unemployment, and skyrocketing street crime.

Combine this with the lawless situation on the Venezuelan-Colombian border, where Colombian and Venezuelan troops mix with murderous guerrillas, drug traffickers, and paramilitaries that have set up shop to take advantage of Chávez’s lax attitude towards cocaine trafficking through Venezuelan territory, and you have a tinderbox that could combust on the slightest miscalculation, or irresponsible action.

It is incumbent on the Obama administration to prevent that by dispelling any ambiguity about where U.S. interests lie if this cold war were to go suddenly hot. It is a perfect opportunity for newly installed Assistant Secretary of State for the Western Hemisphere Arturo Valenzuela, a serious and well-respected scholar of the region, to junk the administration’s campaign talking points on “improving relations with Venezuela” -- which sends the absolutely wrong signal to Chávez -- stop being so defensive about the Colombia agreement (whose badly managed rollout helped to spur the crisis), and deliver a private and direct message to Chávez that the administration would consider any military confrontation with Colombia a direct threat to the strategic interests of the United States.

This is not about our own saber-rattling or mimicking Chávez’s microphone diplomacy that only inflames tensions, but engaging in forceful but quiet diplomacy to prevent any outbreak of hostilities on the border.

Indeed, successive U.S. administrations have invested too much into our strategic partnership with Colombia to tolerate the likes of Hugo Chávez attempting to roll back its multiple successes. (Ample evidence already exists of Chávez providing safe haven and arms to Colombian narcoterrorists.) Since 2000, the U.S. has spent some $6 billion on Plan Colombia, a counternarcotics and counterinsurgency plan that has rescued the country from the grip of the narcoterrorists and paramilitaries. Today, Colombia is a safer and more prosperous country under the leadership of President Álvaro Uribe, with crucial support from the United States. (Incidentally, the capstone of this successful partnership was to be congressional approval of the U.S.-Colombia Free Trade Agreement, but that deal was shelved by Democratic leaders in Congress last year and Obama has shown no inclination to revive it.)

But the peace has yet to be won in Colombia. The narcoterrorists have been seriously degraded by President Uribe’s aggressive prosecution of the war against them, but they have not been eliminated.

Whether we like it or not, the politics (and economics) of oil means we are probably stuck with Chávez for some time to come. But for Hugo Chávez the oil card must not be a license to threaten neighbors with war and destabilizing the region. The Obama administration needs to remind him of that fact.

JUANN BARRETO/AFP/Getty Images

 
Facebook|Twitter|Reddit

ZACH.M

2:38 AM ET

November 30, 2009

Agree to some extent but...

You must remember that

a) Like his mentor Fidel Castro, Chavez is a coward.
b) He is surrounded by cowards. None of his military staff has ever fired a shot in any sort of armed conflict. They will probably put a bullet into Chavez's brain before heading into any military conflict that will certainly have most of them killed.
c) An armed conflict with Colombia will certainly mean the end of Hugo Chavez's regime because of a and b above. Also, operationally the Venezuelan army is far inferior than the Colombian army which has been seasoned by decades of conflict.
d) A few well placed bombs will bring Venezuela into a stand still.

Chavez is aware of all of the above. So relax, there will be no war. I do, however, think it is time for the United States to take a stronger stance against Chavez. No more oil purchases and strong sanctions against all his corrupt government officials. I assure you that will have an effect.

 

BERNARD Y

8:16 AM ET

November 30, 2009

So his regime wanted to

So his regime wanted to invade the people and put them into a terrible country. Well, I don't care about his way of government but I care about how will Obama change the system of government. The internet has increased communication in a way previously impossible. The internet has exploded, and opened doors to almost anything and everything, including finance and employment opportunities.

 

DEPETRIS@WORDPRESS.COM

4:26 PM ET

November 30, 2009

Venezuela-Columbia conflict unlikely

To begin with, any Venezuelan troop deployment against U.S. soldiers stationed in Columbia would not only be politically and militarily irrational…it would have suicidal consequences for Mr. Chavez’s socialist outlook throughout Central and South America. Nobody in the world can dispute the pervasive ineptitude that has taken root within Venezuela’s military establishment over the past decade. Ever since Mr. Chavez’s triumphant rise to power in 1998, the country’s armed-forces have been frequently categorized as ill-equipped and technologically-inferior in relation to its “arch enemies” in Latin America (Columbia, Brazil, Argentina, and Paraguay).

Such conclusions do not even take into account the fact that Venezuela’s army…the same portion of the political hierarchy that gives Chavez most of his support…is comprised of poorly-trained and amateur soldiers who have yet to be tested in any external conflict (some of whom simply join the ranks for economic reasons as opposed to an ideological belief in the Socialist Dream). For this reason, more tanks, jets, and helicopters in Caracas should not be of concern to the White House. As FP's Joshua Keating FP says, “bringing a bigger knife to a gun fight doesn’t really shift the odds in your favor.” With Venezuelan troops already suffering from a lack of morale, destroying Venezuelan resistance will continue to be a relatively easy task for both the U.S. Military and the U.S-trained Columbian Security Forces.

http://depetris.wordpress.com

 

ROBERT ELETTO

9:23 PM ET

November 30, 2009

Distorted Perspectives

"Since 2000, the U.S. has spent some $6 billion on Plan Colombia, a counternarcotics and counterinsurgency plan that has rescued the country from the grip of the narcoterrorists and paramilitaries."

Are you serious? "Rescued the country"? Our own Government Accountability Office (GAO) released a report on Plan Colombia last year that concluded - rather decidedly - that Plan Colombia was a failure. And they put the cost at closer to $9 Billion.

Colombia is still the epicenter of drug trafficking in the Americas; US drug-war support has only weakened the FARC and bought out some right-wing groups. It hasn't solved the systemic issue of violence in Colombia. The country remains the most dangerous places for journalists and human rights workers in the hemisphere, and has an internally-displaced population second only to Sudan.

Beyond the bogus claims about Plan Colombia, I think this article is framing the issue unfairly. Chavez is not alone in his discomfort about US military bases in Colombia - in fact, almost all of UNASUR has expressed distaste for the plan. Why? Because they almost all agree that the "War on Drugs" is a FAILED APPROACH that actually makes things worse for the region. Why should they tolerate the presence of hundreds of elite soldiers from a nation that has HABITUALLY invaded Latin American countries - when that nation is justifying its presence in terms of a FAILED APPROACH?

Of course this is irrelevant for Cardenas, who disingenuously glides past the issue with the assumption that re-militarizing the War on Drugs is somehow an efficient and virtuous endeavor that should be welcomed with open arms by the region. The brazen disregard for actually analyzing this crucial assumption makes it hard to take the article seriously.

Also, I wish more of the coverage of Latin America's power dynamics wasn't just reduced to Chavez being an asshole. We all know he's an asshole. It's only part of the equation, and more often than not, it's not a terribly important part.

 

HOOK97

5:47 AM ET

December 7, 2009

ed hardy kids t shirts

as 'old is suddenly Cheap Ed Hardy Belts new,' thus Ed Hardy Tops Sale fashionable. The Ed Hardy Shoes Sale term "fashion" is Ed Hardy Jeans Sale frequently used Ed Hardy Hoodies Sale in a positive Ed Hardy T Shirts Sale sense, as a Ed Hardy Swimwear Sale synonym for glamour, beauty Ed Hardy hats Sale and style[citation needed]. In this Ed Hardy caps Sale sense, fashions are Ed Hardy Kids Sale a sort of communal Ed Hardy Sunglasses Sale art, through Ed Hardy Bags Sale which a culture examines Ed Hardy SPECIALS Sale

 

HOOK97

1:18 AM ET

December 8, 2009

a

a number of cities recognized as Abercrombie and Fitch Women Sweaters global fashion centers or fashion Abercrombie and Fitch Women Outerwears capitals. Fashion Weeks are held in these Abercrombie and Fitch Women Hoodies cities where designers exhibit their new Abercrombie and Fitch Women Polos clothing collections to audiences. The main Abercrombie and Fitch Women Knit Layers five cities are Tokyo, London, Paris, Milan Abercrombie and Fitch Bags

 

Shadow Government is a blog about U.S. foreign policy under the Obama administration, written by experienced policy makers from the loyal opposition and curated by Peter D. Feaver and William Inboden.

Read More