Friday, October 16, 2009 - 6:37 PM

The news that a "deal" may be in the works to return former Honduran President Manuel "Mel" Zelaya to office is a defeat for democratic order and rule of law in the Americas. [Full disclosure: I helped a Honduran business delegation travel to Washington in July 2009 to brief U.S. policymakers on the crisis there.] Tiny Honduras has been bludgeoned by the international community -- including the United States -- into effectively violating its own constitution and trampling its own political processes by reinstating this would-be autocrat, despite formal charges against him for acts of fraud, treason, and abuse of power that no serious observer disputes.
For decades, U.S. policy towards Latin America has been to work with our neighbors to supplant "rule of the strongman" with rule of law and fealty to constitutional processes. So how is it that now the United States is advocating the complete reversal of a long-standing bipartisan policy approach in our hemisphere? Unfortunately, the Obama administration's slow response to the deposing of Zelaya -- despite the crisis building in Honduras over the past year - allowed the ever-opportunistic Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez to exploit the situation by portraying himself as the defender of "democracy" in the region by demanding his ally Zelaya's immediate return to power.
For an Obama administration seemingly following a reflexive "Anything But Bush" policy in the region, there was thus little option but to take the same side as Chavez and Fidel Castro -- not exactly the side to be on when the issues are democratic order and rule of law in the Americas. What the Administration should have done is support Honduras' democratic institutions in their removal of a rogue president and help the country prepare for the previously scheduled Presidential elections on Nov. 29 (with the formal transfer of power to occur in January 2010), after which interim President Roberto Micheletti would step down and constitutional order would prevail.
The stakes in Honduras couldn't be higher. For the first time since Hugo Chavez led a succession of neo-populists into power in the region, leaders who immediately set about undermining separation of powers and aggrandizing control in the executive, a polity has stood up and, acting within its own legal boundaries, basically rejected such a future for themselves. By siding with the Honduran people in this crisis, the United States could have done much to deflate Chavismo in the region. It is a missed opportunity that will come back to haunt us.
As for the present, given Zelaya's confrontational and reckless behavior since being removed from the country -- buzzing the capital in an aircraft and sneaking back into the country to take up residence in the Brazilian Embassy and exhort his followers into the streets -- his remaining days in power are unlikely to be quiet and uneventful. The Honduran people deserve better, as do all struggling democrats in the Americas.
ORLANDO SIERRA/AFP/Getty Images
...that Mr. Cardenas is no longer playing a direct role in US foreign policy making. His cold war vision of the region - with fear of the "Reds" trumping any sort of concern for democratic principles - has done more than enough harm to Latin Americans and US relations in the hemisphere. Thankfully, the new administration - along with every other country in the hemisphere - is fully cognizant of the fact that a coup d'etat took place in Honduras on June 28th. There is of course no other way to characterize the illegal ousting and deportation of a democratically elected president.
It's also worth noting that Cardenas' disclosure only tells half the story. The "business delegation" that he mentiones refers in fact to a group of supporters and promoters of the June 28 coup that, with the assistance of Cardenas and his colleague Roger Noriega, came to Washington to lobby against the restoration of democracy in Honduras. Thankfully, the extensive resources that have been poured into the pro coup lobbying efforts in Washington have only succeeded so far in generating support within the extreme right wing of the Republican party (with recruits like Senator Demint, Ros Lehtinen and the Diaz Balart brothers)
Scholartramp, you obviously have absolutely no idea what you're talking about whatsoever. So how about reading a few articles to enlighten yourself? Here are links to an English editorial series from Honduras This Week Online that lays out a) what a coupe is and why this was not one, b) how Zelaya violated the law and the Constitution of Honduras, c) why Honduran law not only *required* Zelaya's ouster, but prohibits him from *ever* serving in public office in Honduras again, and may even provide grounds for revoking his citizenship, and d) an actual time-line of events. What he tried to do was a very, very big deal.
http://www.hondurasthisweek.com/editorial/1441-honduras-crisis
http://www.hondurasthisweek.com/editorial/1442-honduras-crisis
http://www.hondurasthisweek.com/editorial/1443-honduras-crisis
http://www.hondurasthisweek.com/editorial/1444-honduras-crisis
Moreover, the UN did a study of the situation with regard to Honduran Constitutional Law, and found that this was, in fact, a constitutional removal of a sitting president. The UN Secretary General proceeded to then say that he would ignore the study.
http://www.hondudiarioh.com/l/content/destituci%C3%B3n-de-zelaya-fue-constitucional-onu
If you want to read a synopsis of the above article in English, along with links and other blog articles about the situation going back to the beginning, check out La Gringa's Blogicito (http://lagringasblogicito.blogspot.com).
One last point: if Manuel Zelaya is so innocent, and has no desires to violate the Honduran Constitution by changing it to allow him to remain in office, why is he now proposing, as his hopes for reinstatement fade, to change the Honduran government to include a currently non-existent Senate, that would include each living former President as "Senator for Life"? That's a pretty wild suggestion for a man not concerned with remaining in power after the pending elections.
Perhaps next time you should actually purchase a clue before you go off completely half-cocked about things you obviously know nothing about.
Shadow Government is a blog about U.S. foreign policy under the Obama administration, written by experienced policy makers from the loyal opposition and curated by Peter D. Feaver and William Inboden.
Read More
(2)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE