Monday, June 29, 2009 - 4:24 PM
By Tom Mahnken
Journalists have produced many caricatures of Donald Rumsfeld, but no portraits. Until now, that is. Bradley Graham's By His Own Rules (PublicAffairs) offers a nuanced portrayal of the former defense secretary that is likely to serve as the definitive work for years to come. Those who dislike Rumsfeld will find plenty to stoke their anger; those who admire him much that is praiseworthy. Those few with an open mind will learn a great deal about the man, his gifts and his flaws.
The product of years of thorough research, Graham's book is journalism at its best. The anonymous "former senior defense official" makes a few appearances in the book's eight hundred pages, but as a rule he cites his sources by name, and everything contained in quotation marks is a direct quote. He presents the story, but ultimately gives the reader the opportunity to make his own judgments.
By His Own Rules busts many of the stereotypes of Rumsfeld. My top three:
Graham's book also sheds light on a number of Rumsfeld's unheralded successes. For example, he led an effort to realign the U.S. armed forces' basing structure across the globe away from a structure optimized for the Cold War past in order to position the United States better to respond to current and future threats. And Rumsfeld, confronted with a war planning process that was cumbersome and unresponsive to strategic direction, championed the Adaptive Planning Initiative, which has led to plans that are developed more rapidly, feature more options, and benefit from greater guidance from senior leaders.
History will render its verdict on Donald Rumsfeld's second tenure in the Pentagon, but By His Own Rules contains mountains of evidence for both the prosecution and the defense.
Though no cheerleader for Donald Rumsfeld, I oftened wondered what kind of advice and the quality of the generalship the former SecDef delt with?
Though I don't characterize Rumsfeld as Adolf Hilter by any stretch of the imagination. Study suggests the German General Staff often recognized Hitler's talents far more than they later wanted to admit - hoping history would show they were never at fault.
As military veteran I was somewhat puzzled and frustrated by the endless number of retired General/Flag Officers who criticized how Rumsfeld alledgely mistreated them or their colleagues. While I have no doubt that Rumsfeld was acerbic, harsh and scathing in his rebukes to his generals and admirals, I do not feel sorry these people. Why? First and foremost they have risen to very highest levels of military service and we have to expect that they have to have their collective act together and if they don't then a butt-chewing is in order; secondly, having senior civilians get after them comes with the turf and if they can't take it then they should find some other line of work; and finally, how many field grade and company grade officers have felt the sting of the acerbic, harsh, and scathing rebukes from these very same generals and admirals? I am sure quite a few.
I personally lay the blame for some (though not all)for the Iraq situation squarely on the shoulders of these generals and admirals. They spend their entire career, in theory anyway, studying the essence and nature of war. How they could miss the post-conflict aspect(after the fall of Baghdad) of Iraq is what needs to be examined as much as Rumsfeld is criticized for this aspect-and rightly so.
Shadow Government is a blog about U.S. foreign policy under the Obama administration, written by experienced policy makers from the loyal opposition and curated by Peter D. Feaver and William Inboden.
Read More
(2)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE