Global News : Passport : Ricks : Drezner : Walt : Rothkopf : Lynch
The Cable : The AfPak Blog : Net Effect : Shadow Govt. : Madam Secretary : The Call
Questions for Obama at 100 days
To mark his 100th day in office tomorrow, President Obama will hold a primetime press conference. Here are some questions from the writers of this blog that Obama should be asked but probably won't be. We challenge journalists to put any of these questions to the president. Your prize for doing so? A lifetime subscription to this blog. We'll be watching. On a channel other than Fox that is.
Steve Biegun:
Do you believe Iran is pursuing the development of nuclear weapons?
With your first year as president now nearly a third over, when do you plan to meet your commitment for face-to-face meetings with the leaders of North Korea, Iran, and Syria?
Christian Brose:
Are there any circumstances under which you would amend your plan for withdrawing U.S. troops from Iraq such that you would maintain a military presence there beyond 2011?
Peter Feaver:
During the first 100 days, your administration has tried to highlight as much as possible the changes with the previous administration. Can you identify three important areas where even you would claim you are largely just continuing the policies of the Bush administration?
Aaron Friedberg:
If you had reason to believe that a captured terrorist had knowledge of an imminent attack that could kill thousands of Americans but was refusing to divulge it, would you authorize the use of "enhanced interrogation techniques" to extract that information?
Will Inboden:
Some political and religious dissidents in authoritarian countries have quietly voiced their concerns that, in the process of reaching out to the autocrats who control their countries, your administration is paying little heed to -- let alone supporting -- the aspirations of these activists to see more freedom and justice in their countries. What tangible steps, if any, will your administration take -- even if it incurs the displeasure of authoritarian rulers -- to support the desire for liberty that many citizens have in places like Iran, Burma, China, North Korea, Venezuela, and Cuba?
Phil Levy:
You have noted widespread agreement among economists that countries should borrow in downturns to try to stimulate the economy. This approach also implies that countries should run surpluses in good times to pay the money back. When do you envision the United States next running a surplus and paying down its debt?
Tom Mahnken:
Can the United States live with a nuclear Iran?
Mitchell Reiss:
Which foreign policy strategy do you subscribe to: neo-isolationism, selective engagement (neo-realism), cooperative security (building and strengthening international institutions), or American primacy?
Kori Schake:
How do you think the debt envisioned in your budget will affect U.S. national security?
Kristen Silverberg:
Is there any possibility you would sign a climate change agreement at Copenhagen that obligates the United States to reduce greenhouse gas emissions but does not impose a similar obligation on China and India?
Dan Twining:
Most Americans share the Founding Fathers' belief that our country is exceptional. Indeed, your own campaign and election seemed to validate this judgment. Do you believe American exceptionalism has been a force for good, not only for our country but for the world -- and will it continue to be?
Dov Zakheim:
The Israelis seem deadly serious about attacking Iran and suspect that Tehran will use talks with the United States to stall for time to go nuclear, as North Korea once did. Are you prepared to set a time limit for our talks with Iran? If so, how long?






Foreign policy: the administration of President Obama
The following is an approach to a workable foreign policy for the administration of President Obama.
Palestinian Independent State
The problems of Palestinian subjugation to Israel occupation are the seeds for an unstable world including the Middle East. Many expect, as previously stated by Iran and many Arab counties, that they would not reject a reasonable break through between Washington and Israel over the Palestinians home state. However; many political analysts have suggested that any resolution about Palestinian state would be a non-starter with Israel. The success or failure of the administration of President Obama with Israel would determine the nature of future stability for the Middle East.
There is no dispute that Iran is already a nuclear state. The states with this capacity are many; among them are Japan and Germany. But, there is a great difference between being a nuclear state, i.e., nuclear fuel cycle capacity, and a state with nuclear bomb, such as India, USA, Russia, England, France, China, Israel and Pakistan.
The steps required to allay our fear that Iran in the future may develop Nuclear Bomb are:
1. Nuclear Fuel Cycle Iranian Consortium:USA should join the consortium among others Japan, Germany, France and England to actively monitor the Iranian fuel cycle activity too. IAEA has consistently asserted that the agency could not find any indications that Iran is diverting the fuel cycle for nuclear bomb development. Iran has asserted that their activities are limited to development of fuel for nuclear reactor.
2. Nuclear Shield
An international nuclear shield for all nations in the Middle East, including Iran;
3. A nuclear- bomb-free Middle East.
This action will remove any pressure from Iran to develop nuclear bomb in the future for deterrence against nuclear bomb Israeli state.
Unfortunately the attentions of the past two US Presidents (Clinton and Bush) were on nuclear fuel cycle of Iran. They both ignored that Israel had nuclear bombs. The Middle East should be the starting point toward President Obama’s dream of a world free of all nuclear bombs.