The left comes along on Afghanistan

Tue, 03/24/2009 - 6:34pm

By Christian Brose

Can you guess which think tank just released these key findings in its latest report on Afghanistan?

Short-term goals over the next 18 months

  • Prevent Afghanistan from being used as a safe haven for terrorist and extremist groups with a global reach to attack the United States, its allies, and its interests
  • Prevent a security vacuum in Afghanistan from destabilizing Pakistan and the region
  • Couple efforts to stabilize Afghanistan with a parallel, integrated strategy for Pakistan, with a particular focus on helping Pakistanis build a stable civilian government committed to working toward the elimination of terrorist safe havens within its territory

Intermediate policy goals over the next three to five years

  • Promote a viable Afghan economy that offers realistic opportunities for the Afghan people
  • Sharply curb the poppy trade in Afghanistan and the region
  • Promote democracy, the rule of law, and human rights in Afghanistan and the region
  • Resolve or at least reduce regional tensions, particularly between Pakistan and its neighbors, which frequently spill over into Afghanistan

Long-term policy goals over the next 10 years

  • Assist in creating an Afghan state that is able to defend itself internally and externally, and that can provide for the basic needs of its own people
  • Prepare for the full military withdrawal from Afghanistan alongside continued diplomatic and economic measures to promote the sustainable security of Afghanistan

These goals cannot be achieved with the current level of resources and lack of coordination.... The problem is not that the Bush administration’s effort in Afghanistan failed. The problem is that it was never given a chance to succeed.

The addition of 17,000 U.S. combat troops and military support personnel by summer 2009—bringing U.S. troops to 55,000, their highest level to date—may be sufficient to freeze the security situation in Afghanistan for a while, but it is surely not enough to turn the tide. The United States must fulfill the request of General David McKiernan, the commander of the allied International Security Assistance Force, for an additional 15,000 U.S. troops, bringing the number of U.S. forces to 70,000, or about half the level in Iraq. This increase must include troops for combat as well as mentor teams for the Afghan National Army and Afghan National Police to fill critical gaps in the training effort.

Together with the 32,000 coalition troops already there, this increase will bring international forces to about 100,000—a nearly 300 percent increase over the average force level for the period from 2002 to 2007. This force level will most probably need to be sustained in the short term to intermediate term as Afghanistan’s army and police forces become more capable and ready.

This is brought to you by none other than those war-mongering neo-cons from the Center for American Progress. Considering that John Podesta was running Obama's transition, this nice piece of cover now appearing to the president's left is no coincidence, and I suspect it means that his policy review will almost certainly end up, as expected, escalating the U.S. role in Afghanistan. If so, the devil will be in the details, and we'll see those soon.

( filed under: )


Advertisement

 

Ummm...

Except for the far pacifist left (which neither Obama nor Podesta nor CAP are a part of), most of the "left" has long recognized the critical importance of the war in Afghanistan. In fact, Mr. Brose, you might have noticed (or perhaps it was hard to see from inside your bubble) that the "left" lamented that the war in Iraq was consuming vital resources--human and financial--that could have been better employed in Afghanistan. In other words, it was, in part, precisely because Afghanistan is so important than those on the left thought the war in Iraq was such a mistake.

Both Mr. Brose and Thucydides

Both Mr. Brose and Thucydides have it wrong. The peace movement opposes the war policy in Afghanistan and Pakistan and regret that Pres. Obama has been able to give it the legitimacy that the discredited Pres. Bush could not. We should cancel the escalation of forces, withdraw the forces that are there, stop bombing Pakistan, end support for the Pakistani military, support negotations, and support development and reconstruction programs led by local Afghan groups. Afghanistan will be Obama's Vietnam if not.

Cole Harrison
United for Justice with Peace, Boston

As I said...

Except for the far pacifist left. I think it's fair to say that Mr. Harrison does not speak for the majority of the moderate left.

Is the US a "Zombie" Super Power?

The decline of the US from "the world's sole remaining superpower" to "zombie power" in a few short years can be discussed using macro level indicators such as Chinese communist government holdings of US government bonds, Russian foreign policy adventurism due to oil wealth, depletion of US military power as a result of over extension of US forces around the world, the bleeding of resources as a result of the Iraq and Afgan wars and finally the Israeli lobby control of Middle East policy due to ... you know what!

A micro level analysis reveals the extent to which "clients" of US power have turned into masters of US foreign policy. The tail is wagging the dog ... and the superpower is now a zombie power and it does not know that it is dead!

1. Turkey, Iraq and the Kurds

Notwithstanding US tacit support, for over 60 years, for Turkish cultural genocide of its ethnic Kurdish minority, Turkey refused to allow US forces to use Turkish territory to invade Iraq. No US retaliation for this insolent behavior.

2. Turkey and the Armenian Resolution

Armenian resolution almost destroyed decades long alliance between Turkey and US. American politicians can be bought for a political donations.

3. Iraq is expelling US forces after 2011 contrary to US desire for permanent base. Can't the CIA overthrow these suckers?

4. Macedonia - "What's in a name"?

A small change is the US Report on Human Rights in Greece foreshadows a change by the Obama administration regarding the current US recognition of the Republic of Macedonia by its constitutional name instead of the UN imposed compromise of FYROM (Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia). The US once overthrew a democratically elected Greek government and supported a military dictatorship, now Obama smashes a plate every time the Greek lobby says "opa!"