Posted By Peter Feaver Share

By Peter Feaver

I wonder if my Shadow Government colleagues feel somewhat like I do today. My dominant feeling is pride in this country -- pride that we can transfer the most powerful office on earth peacefully, and pride that the new president is an American success story whose success is a capstone to the struggle that marked the founding of the Republican party. (I am also proud of the work that was done in the Bush administration to manage the transition and help prepare the new team for the awesome challenges; perhaps that will be a post for another day, but today is Obama's day and we should focus on him.)

Peeping out from under the pride is another feeling: hope. I am not talking about the moonpie hope that propelled Obama to office. Nor am I talking about hope that Obama can fix all of the problems we face, let alone pay my gas and mortgage.

Rather, the hope I feel concerns Obama's opportunity to reshuffle the deck of partisan politics, at least insofar as it relates to national security. As of noon today, responsibility for protecting America rests squarely with the Democratic party. To be sure, Republicans are obliged to be constructive from their seats in the loyal opposition. But the buck now stops with President Obama and the Congressional leadership.

Pundits have compared today to many other presidential inaugurations -- Lincoln, FDR, Kennedy -- but in national security terms the most significant parallel is Eisenhower's in 1953, when Republicans wrested back control of the White House and the Congress. In doing so, they made the Cold War truly a bipartisan responsibility. I believe we won the Cold War largely because we were able to sustain our efforts across administrations and across parties.

Today marks the day when we do the same thing with the struggle against the violent extremists that attacked us on 9/11 and with the military battles still being waged in Iraq, Afghanistan, and elsewhere. Whether or not we win our current "cold war" depends on whether we can similarly share the responsibility for that struggle across administrations and across parties.

The one man with the most responsibility for success or failure in this larger enterprise now is President Obama. I am proud to call him my president. I hope he succeeds.
 

 

STARING IN DISBELIEF

5:42 PM ET

January 20, 2009

I think you are setting the

I think you are setting the bar kind of low here. "Peaceful Transfer Of Power" has been happening in the US for over 200 years and is not nearly so rare overseas now as it once was (hell, even the Russians under the Communists did it).

As for "reshuffling the partisan deck", there is always a bit of "Previous Administration Fatigue" that ensures some level of open-minded spirit when there is a new president inaugurated (aka "The Honeymoon"). I personally think that the only way to fight the stupefying hypocrisy of the left (our wars good, Republican wars bad and the ever-popular contrast between BushChimpHitler and We're All In This Together) is to relentlessly hammer them on it and don't concede an inch when we think we are right.

What little I have seen about this nearly experience-free man makes it impossible for me to be proud of him at this point. While no giant fan of John McCain, I am appalled that this smooth empty coasted to victory on the "I'm Not Them" platform. His "Hope that the Change I have in mind is good for you" approach enabled millions of semi-literates to fill in the blanks while he could glibly ignore answering any real questions.

He has my respect as the elected President, but he will have to earn my admiration. His actions will determine whether I will ever be proud of him. Time will tell.

 

Shadow Government is a blog about U.S. foreign policy under the Obama administration, written by experienced policy makers from the loyal opposition and curated by Peter D. Feaver and William Inboden.

Read More