Posted By Dov Zakheim Share

By Dov Zakheim

Many years ago, my family huddled around our television watching Lyndon Johnson announce that he would not run again for president. My late father said he didn't believe Johnson; that's how much Johnson's "credibility gap", as it was then euphemistically called, had sunk into the psyche of average Americans. Whatever else one might say about George W. Bush, no one can assert that he is devious, or dissembling; no one can doubt that, from his first day in office to his farewell address, he has always meant, and believed in, what he has said.

In his brief address, the president made it clear that what concerns him the most is the nation's security. He is proud that there has not been another terrorist incident since 9/11; proud that he created the Department of Homeland Security; proud that he has transformed the military and the intelligence services. He truly believes that it is the mission of the United States to spread freedom to every nook and cranny around the globe, to transform societies everywhere. I did not do a "word count," but it seemed that the word "freedom" was repeated more often than any other. And he remains an internationalist in the broadest sense of that term, strongly advocating free trade and viewing isolationism and protectionism as two sides of the same coin.

The President devoted few words to domestic issues, including the current economic crisis. His priorities were clear: his focus was on America's role in the world.

The President has often said that history will be the ultimate judge of his record. Indeed, many historians have already rushed to render a negative judgment of that record. But there can be little doubt that George W. Bush remains as comfortable in his own skin as ever he has been, and that he truly believes that, in the cosmic battle between good and evil, he has stood firmly, squarely, and consistently, on the side of what is "good."

 

SFERNANDO

4:26 PM ET

January 16, 2009

"many historians have already

"many historians have already rushed to render a negative judgment of that record."
yes but historians are only just one of the judges of historical record.

 

WOLFBOY

5:16 PM ET

January 16, 2009

Devious and Dissembling

OK, I'll bite-

Bush is devious and dissembling.

Bush claimed, in March 2003, that "We are doing everything we can to avoid war in Iraq."

That does not square with this, or with common sense and the public record. Do you believe it Dr. Zakheim?

or the old favorite:
"The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa."

It is at best devious (and more reasonably dissembling) to claim that the British government has 'learned' something about which the US government is highly skeptical. This particular wording was an obvious (in hindsight), and certainly devious, attempt to finesse this issue.

Indeed, I find much of he says to be part of an un-straightforward, sly effort to frame the issues, often through calculated omission.

 

Shadow Government is a blog about U.S. foreign policy under the Obama administration, written by experienced policy makers from the loyal opposition and curated by Peter D. Feaver and William Inboden.

Read More